That UFOs exist is now beyond doubt. The weight of evidence is overwhelming.
What, who or what they are is a far more difficult issue to deal with.
There are any number of theories on this subject. Some are clearly more crackpot
than others but there are those that may have some element of truth based on
For example how does a saucer shaped craft fly at all, particularly in Earth’s
atmospheric conditions? There have been several experiments demonstrating the
principles of how this might be achieved. Our best guess is that these craft use
the electro-magnetic fields of the planet to create a state of zero gravity.
How do these craft suddenly appear and disappear? One theory is that this has
something to do with an ability to raise and lower the frequencies of energy in
these craft. At certain frequencies we are able to see them but at higher levels
they become invsible to us but may in fact still be there.
Other theories maintain that these craft are interdimensional rather than
extra-terrestrial. This may mean that there are other realities that exist
possibly in the same space or a different space that we are not attuned to.
Then there are the worm holes, vortexes etc., that allow these craft to travel
huge distances in the blink of an eye. The truth is thatt whilst this all sounds
feasible, we cannot sustantiate any of it becase it is outside the laws of
physics as we understand them.
Howevever, I digress. The question I want to address is the intent of these
beings. So far as we are able to judge they have shown no intent as yet to
conquer the planet. There is credible evidence that they have been visiting for
thousands of years and yet we are still here. If they want the Earth what is
stopping them. Their technology is so advanced compared to ours we would be
powerless to stop them. This is a strong indicator that their intent is not
antagonistic. They may have particular empathy either. We may just be a living
laboratory which they observe with scientific detachment.
The point is that until they prove otherwise we cannot assume they are either
antagonistic or philanthropic. We just dont know yet.
Lastly, may I suggest that unless we as a species become more enlightened, less
hostile to each other and so on, we will never survive long enough to attain
their advanced technological state. This suggests that the perception
of the survival of the fittest does not depend on who is the strongest but who
is the smartest. War is stupid. Domination is a the path of self destruction
because it creates conflict and in conflict one cannot guarantee survival.
Survival depends on co- operation, understanding, tolerance, compassion and yes
I believe that tells us something about the who. The most advanced life forms
will be those that are connected and work together, not those who are
disconnected and destroy each other. Any destruction unbalances the whole.